If you’re one of the seemingly few firms who has yet to make the move to the cloud, it could be for a variety of reasons. Perhaps you want to maintain total control of your IT environment. Or maybe you’re waiting for a tech refresh to motivate you. Alternatively, it could be that you just haven’t made the proper case to management for switching to the cloud – and many times the one who really needs convincing is the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
If you’re the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) or IT Manager, your responsibility is determining the infrastructure choices that are going to best suit operations at your firm. But those priorities may not line up exactly with those of the firm’s CFO. IT doesn’t always have insight into the financial ramifications of an operations decision of this magnitude. Instead they are typically focused on the other benefits including personnel reallocation, workflow efficiencies, etc.
The CFO, on the other hand, is ultimately tasked with ensuring the company’s financial decisions are appropriate, and therefore, it’s often advantageous to at least attempt to speak his/her language when pushing for an IT change.
As hedge funds and investment management firms shore up security practices in an effort to comply with the SEC cybersecurity expectations and other industry and investor standards, it can become overwhelming to sort out what's required and how firms should go about achieving compliance. It can also be easy to make mistakes. We asked Eze Castle's Business Continuity and Data Privacy Manager, Lisa Smith, to tell us about some of the common information security mistakes she witnesses firms make and how to avoid them in the future. Here are some of the key questions Lisa answers:
Where are you seeing the most deficiencies in cybersecurity preparedness?
What goes into an effective Written Information Security Plan?
What common mistakes do you find firms are making when it comes to information security safeguards?
Take a look at Lisa's answers!
The results from our Global Hedge Fund Technology and Operations Benchmark Study are in and here is a snapshot of the 2014 findings. You can find the complete report here. We surveyed 279 buy-side firms across the United States, United Kingdom and Asia in order to discover their front, middle, and back office technology and application preferences.
Respondent Profile[Hedge Funds by Type]All survey respondents fell into the following categories within the financial industry: hedge fund (58%), asset/investment manager (13%), private equity firm (3%), fund of fund (3%), and family office (3%). Additionally, 13 percent fell into an ‘other’ category, which included financial firm types such as venture capital, advisory, fund management, quant and wealth management.
Firms surveyed fell into three asset groups: thirty-three percent (33%) reported their assets under management (AUM) as less than $100 million; twenty-eight percent (28%) fell between $101 and $500 million; and the majority (39%) reported over $500 million AUM.
In regards to investment strategy, long/short equity continues to dominate as the most favorable with 50 percent (50%) of respondents reporting this to be their primary investment strategy. Additional preferred strategies include credit (8%), fixed income (6%), emerging markets (5%), event driven (4%), and distressed debt (3%). Twenty-four percent (24%) of firms fell into an “Other” category that included a wide variety of investment strategies such as commodities, derivatives, merger arbitrage, relative value, securities, global macro, and long only. In 2014, the top primes employed by firms are Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Credit Suisse and UBS (same as 2013 results).
In it's fourth year running, our Global Hedge Fund Technology Benchmark Study reveals the top technology systems and applications used by investment management firms around the world. And while we aren't due to officially release the results until tomorrow - register for our webinar to hear them live - we thought we'd share a little sneak peek in the form of an infographic.
Take a look below and discover how your hedge fund and investment management firm peers are using technology to power their firm operations.
Categorized under: Hedge Fund Due Diligence Launching A Hedge Fund Cloud Computing Security Hedge Fund Operations Hedge Fund Regulation Infrastructure Communications Outsourcing Software Trends We're Seeing Videos And Infographics
Last week, we co-hosted another exciting Hedge Fund Startup event with KPMG in New York and had a great turnout of fund managers looking to learn more about everything from legal and tax implications to technology must-haves and capital raising strategies.
Since technology is clearly our forte, we wanted to share some of the key takeaways from our “Achieving Institutional-Grade IT” panel, featuring speakers from Evercore Partners, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and, of course, Eze Castle Integration. Here are the highlights:
State of Emerging Manager Market
The hedge fund startup market is healthy, and investors’ appetite for emerging managers is strong
Investors are attracted to nimbler, hungrier nature of emerging managers.
Key Priorities for Startups in 2014/2015
Select the right service providers to support your business.
Understand your firm’s vulnerabilities and exposures.
The operational due diligence process is changing, therefore firms need to understand the protections they have in place to secure investor assets.
In any relationship, when things are good, they’re usually pretty good. And when things are bad, sometimes they are really bad. There may come a point when you need to evaluate whether you’re still a good fit together.
Just like with a romantic relationship, your firm’s connection to a service provider (especially an infrastructure/cloud provider you rely on daily) should be strong enough to withstand a few hiccups and healthy enough to warrant open communication at all times. In some cases, it might be clear that you’re in a good place and moving forward together, but sometimes there are sure signs it’s time to call it quits.
Here are a few of those signs:
1. Your provider’s service levels are not up to snuff.
Maybe you recently experienced a major service outage or find that you not-so-conveniently have to work around confusing and interrupting maintenance schedules during work hours. You’re constantly frustrated and don’t feel like you are receiving the level of support that was agreed to – both verbally and as part of your Service Level Agreement (SLA).
Your SLA should clearly indicate the uptime standard (e.g. 99.995% availability) as well as repercussions to any breaches in the contract (for example, service credits) and associated RPOs if disaster recovery is involved
We are excited to be sponsoring the 2014 EzeSoft Client Conference later this week in Boston. For those of you who aren’t familiar, Eze Software Group is the owner of the order management system, Eze OMS, which is frequently used by hedge funds and asset managers across the globe.
As a preview to this week’s conference, we thought we’d dial it back to basics a little and explain exactly what an order management system is and why it’s a critical piece of software for many investment management firms today.
We’ve tapped the expertise of nine experts in the hedge fund startup space to share their thoughts on a range of topics specific to emerging hedge fund managers. Below are some highlights, and you can read the entire Emerging Managers Insight Series eBook here.
Set a realistic schedule to launch and don’t rush to get the hedge fund up and running too quickly. Take the time to partner with the right service providers that will support your business from the start and as you grow.
Budget for a marketer in your first two years of operation. If you look at the largest funds in the industry, they all have substantial investor relations teams that keep current investors informed while prospecting for future investors.
Capital introduction is a much sought after service from prime brokers which can be very helpful in providing a new hedge fund exposure to potential investors. Take advantage of introductions and begin to build relationships with potential investors.
If there’s one thing we’ve learned over the years when it comes to security, it’s that there’s a whole lot more to creating a secure hedge fund (or any business for that matter) than robust technology. Before identifying infrastructure components and implementing operational policies, a firm must first be clear on what its attitude is toward security. This attitude will filter through the company from the top down, and will therefore dictate how employees and the business as a whole operate on a daily basis.
To give you a clearer understanding of what we mean, we’ve created three security profiles that cover a wide spectrum in terms of security attitudes and practices.
Under the Radar: Low Security
If you’re attitude toward security is low, odds are you’re barely scraping the surface in terms of what practices and policies you should be employing to maintain proper security firm-wide. You likely rely on quick fixes to solve problems instead of looking at the bigger picture and thinking strategically about how security can both benefit and protect your business. You’ve employed minimal preparedness efforts and could be in for a difficult task if faced with a serious security incident. You probably take a “it won’t happen to me” attitude and don’t take security seriously enough – a stance that could endanger your firm in the long term.
Categorized under: Security Launching A Hedge Fund Cloud Computing Disaster Recovery Hedge Fund Due Diligence Hedge Fund Operations Hedge Fund Regulation Infrastructure Communications Outsourcing Business Continuity Planning Trends We're Seeing Videos And Infographics
The last five years has seen an increase in reliance on technology among financial institutions. IT outsourcing has become more attractive to the financial services industry - but against the backdrop of increased reliance on complex IT systems and operations is the heightened risk of cyber-attacks and system disruptions.
In June 2013, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued the Technology Risk Management Guideline (TRMG), which addresses existing and emerging technology risks within financial institutions.
The objective of the TRMG is for financial firms to establish a sound and robust technology risk management framework, strengthen system security, reliability, resiliency, recoverability and deploy strong authentication to protect customer data and systems.
In today’s blog article we will take a look at some of the key guidelines covered in the guide: